RAMLI, SHAHRIR & TAJUL | ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS
  • Contact Us
    +603.5635.6262
  • Our Address
    No.31-3, Jalan PJS 11/28B Bandar Sunway
  • Working Hours
    9a.m - 6p.m

New to site?


Login

Lost password? (close)

Already have an account?


Signup

(close)

The Partners

HomeThe FirmThe Partners

[vc_row][vc_column width=”5/6″][vc_empty_space]

TAJUL ANUAR BIN ZUBAIRI
Encik Tajul completed her education (Advanced Diploma in Law) at Mara Institute of Technology, Shah Alam, in 1994 and was called to the Bar in 1995. He chambered with Wan Haron Of Wan Haron Shukri & Nordin in Kuala Lumpur. Upon being called to the Bar, he worked as a legal assistant and junior partner in several firms in the Klang Valley, such as Messrs J. Ganesan Tajul, Messrs Nasira Aziz & co and Messrs Raja Badrol Ramli & Azizi.

In 2001 he formed a new partnership known as Ramli, Shahrir & Tajul. He is now a senior partner of the firm. The firm is located in Bandar Sunway Subang Jaya Selangor.

He has vast experience in litigation and conveyancing matters. He has been conducting negotiation, arbitration, and trial in civil litigation matters. He handled various forms of disputes from different clients from individuals, families and corporate clients.

Apart from handling the sale and transfer of property, he has also advised developers and corporate clients about conveyancing matters.

He also has been advising some government agencies on legal issues.

[/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”5/6″]

A decision from Singapore, the court held that the validity of a marriage between a Muslim men and Maria Hertogh, a 16 years old Dutch girl who had been adopted as a Muslim girl (named Natrah) must be determined by her “lex domicili”. By virtue of that law the marriage was not valid and therefore Maria’s parent still have custody over her. Nevermind the fact that according to Muslim Law that marriage had been perfectly solemnised and valid. The decision in Maria Hertogh had led to civil riots in Singapore. Even as late as 1990 Maria’s case still caught the imigination and held the attention of the Malaysian. - ``in the case of RE MARIA HUBERDINA HERTOGH``- (1971) 17 MLJ 164

[/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][/vc_column][/vc_row]